I Want To Play
July 17th, 2008 by admin
ONE: Describe a project or activity that you have worked on that was outside your comfort zone. Why was it uncomfortable? How did you adapt? Were you glad you took on the project or activity? Would you do it again?
While studying at the , I worked on a project called (previously "Iron VideoMaker"), which took me out of my comfort zone. The independent study project was inspired by my interest in how constraints and play can foster experimentation with video. Within the time-span of one academic term, I tried to achieve the following goals:
* to encourage people to produce digital video work
* to force people to act on their feet by producing work in 48 hours or less
* to inspire play and risk taking through the implementation of constraints and deadlines
* to create a relatively well-known website that would solicit the participation of my classmates, as well as strangers online
* to use to the Internet as a platform for interaction and information distribution
The project became uncomfortable because once I considered my goals, I realized that I would need to build something that I didn't have the tools for. The skills I would need to acquire to complete the project appeared to be both time consuming and hard to understand. I had to learn about programming and databases and decide how to best distribute and collect the information I was interested in working with. Since this was unfamiliar territory, I had to adapt by finding information that could help me learn about these systems. I decided to learn some of the programming language PERL to build my web page. I had to ask for consultation from a programming student, and learned about how to extract different kinds of information in one area and then plug it into new places.
I was glad I took on this project because it laid the groundwork for me to think in different ways. It made me think about how web pages are arranged to evoke different responses from visitors and encourage participation. It also made me think about the architecture of information and how as a designer of that space, I could choose how to guide people to different things. It was exciting to see the range of results. I learned that if I plan it, I can pretty much do anything. I inspired myself by working through these challenges and now feel even more confident when working on projects that depend on stepping out of my comfort zone and learning something new. I would most definitely work on a project like this again.
I think projects that take me out of my comfort zone are projects that force me to grow and work under constraints that I am not acquainted with. Usually, I force myself into these situations, so I am not sure if I would categorize them as uncomfortable. I enjoy challenges, and think that life-long learning and stepping out of "comfort zones" is a necessary part of improving myself and the world around me.
TWO: If you were going to design a new house, what are the key elements that you would consider? Why?
The key elements of my new house would depend most on who would be living in it.
I would firstly make sure the house considered Universal Design, so that as many people as possible, with their varying abilities, could enjoy it.
In addition to the architecture, interior design elements such as paint colors, textures, and furniture arrangements, would influence how inhabitants experience the space, so I would consider those as well.
The structural integrity of the house, how it would stand up to the elements as well as natural disasters (such as earthquakes), is something I would prioritize so that it would protect its inhabitants and stay strong over time.
I would consider how to best use renewable energy forms and build the house with as much reused material as possible in order to enhance sustainability.
Depending on the nature of the architecture, there would be deferred maintenance issues that come up over time, such as needing to repaint or cleaning the heating vents. In designing the house, I would consider how to build better systems to perhaps replace heating ducts, therefore eliminating their need to be cleaned. If the aesthetic appeal of wood shingles really made sense and was cost effective, I would consider what new technologies might mimic this look, while staying within my budget and preventing future maintenance expenditures.
In designing this new house, I would consider how people's lifestyles, technology, available resources, and other external factors such as climate might shift over time and would create a house that had built in tools to adapt to these changes.
I would say that location is a most important consideration for the architect designing the house. When thinking about a house, or a library, as a destination, I would think about how the location should influence the architecture. If the house is to be built in a noisy area, there should be appropriate sound proofing designs if the inhabitants do not want to hear the noise from the outside. Or, if it is by the beach and the inhabitants enjoy looking at the ocean, then I would make sure to put windows facing towards the water. I would design the house to exploit and work with the strengths of the location. By designing south-facing windows, the house could be naturally warmed during the day.
THREE: What concerns about the future of libraries keep you up at night? Why?
I work with young people who are growing up using technology like computers and the Internet to assist them with school reports. I worry about their relationships to well-known web resources such as , , and . Often the databases we have in our library are underutilized and patron training in how these databases work is limited. While someone might find well-rounded and credible information on a person they are researching through a database like Biography Online efficiently, I worry they may instead spend more time following link after link from their search, only to end up with a mediocre result.
I worry that the public image of the library as a useful or necessary resource is declining as people think they can access anything they want online. I worry that their misunderstanding of the ways in which the library operates will keep them from using it. And often, it only takes one misunderstanding to lead a library user out the door. I worry that the reliance on private systems of information distribution will eventually lead to influencing the ways in which people think, and the things people think they want, being led by the groups with the most amount of money.
I worry that people will have a need that the library can fulfill, but they will not be aware of this and their need will go unmet. Or, they will know that the library can help, but maybe the library doesn't accommodate their needs in some way, such as not being open during a person's free time or not having information available in an accessible format. I worry that varied communities will not be able to access the information in the format or on the terms that the library has established.
I worry that the ways in which libraries do outreach and advertise their vast resources are ineffective in reaching communities who would benefit from library tools the most. I also worry that the consistent library users will miss out on things that might interest them because they are using the library within limited pathways. As such, they will not know the other things around them exist, even if they are within the library user's established interest groups.
FOUR: What is the one 21st Century tool you cannot live without? Why?
I could not live without the benefits that Web 2.0 has brought to the Internet for many reasons. It helps me stay in touch but on my own terms. Sometimes I only find out about local music shows if I am hanging around local musicians, when I am busy and not in that scene, I might miss out. Now, if someone I know, or even a stranger (who's music I know I enjoy), is a "friend" of mine on a site like , I can find out about their next show via bulletins they may post or by a calendar they may choose to update. I can also sample music unknown to me for free by visiting different music profiles. If I choose to look at who my friends are friends with, I can begin to explore music and other organizations within their network, with some degree of trust that I will enjoy also appreciate these groups.
I could also not live without Web 2.0 for the reasons of folksonomy. I love exploring people's bookmarks to see the other interests of people who have tagged the same things (interests) as me. It leads me to discover new websites, which can lead to all sorts of new discoveries. I have yet to master search terms like "cookery" when searching for cook books while working at the library, and doubt that many of the library users have this awareness. When using sites like , the ability to tag information with my own language that makes sense to me and suites my needs seems revolutionary.
The potential to combine other Web 2.0 innovations like and , also allows me to connect with people with access to a range of technologies. Non-Internet users can follow a feed of mine using and their telephone to stay updated. And by using their phone and , they can create content to be added to a feed.
In considering my answer this question, I was inspired by and his presentation at the . His tagged for the conference on led me to this insightful .
Posted in Library | No Comments »
Everyone is invited to a free performance at the library this Saturday, July 19! Local teens will be performing "Danny and the Fableworld" an original play that they've written and rehearsed over the past five weeks. The show begins at 2:00 pm in the large meeting room, and will last approximately 30 minutes.
~Tricia is the youth librarian at OWL and can't help but add one more recommendation: Junior Senior's latest offering --it's pure fun and I DARE you to listen to it and NOT smile and dance. CD DANCE JUN